Caesarstone Israel — Full-Site SEO / GEO / AI Audit

Scope: www.caesarstone.co.il + studio.caesarstone.co.il · 1,168 URLs captured live on 2026-10-01 · Prepared by the MaximoSEO team

1 · Executive Summary

URLs audited
Empty pages (200, no content)
"Not found" pages in sitemap
Studio pages noindexed
Missing canonical
Duplicate titles
Missing meta description
Images missing alt
Critical — the entire studio subdomain is blocked from indexing. All content pages on studio.caesarstone.co.il carry <meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">, and Google returns zero indexed pages for site:studio.caesarstone.co.il. The A&D professional platform (catalog, projects, kits, guides) is invisible to Google and AI engines until this is removed.
Critical — 445 sitemap URLs serve empty pages. The studio “3D files” section (DWG / DXF / GSM download endpoints) returns HTTP 200 with an empty document (106 bytes). They are listed in the sitemap, cannot render (Lighthouse: “The page did not paint any content”), and waste crawl budget.
Performance on mobile templates is catastrophic. Sampled key pages score 4–42 / 100 (Performance, mobile, simulated throttling): homepage LCP 19.6 s, catalog LCP 36.1 s, collections LCP 34.7 s, TBT up to 44 s. Studio pages score 32–35 with SEO 50–58.
Backlink profile is healthy but leaking. DR 46 · 16,859 live backlinks · 1,122 live referring domains. Legacy .aspx URLs still attract links (203 refdomains to one), two legacy pages now 404 with 30–37 refdomains each, and a WordPress wp-signup.php URL collected 749 referring domains of spam. High-authority media links (WSJ, CNN, FT, ynet, mako) mostly point at the homepage.
Freshness & content signals lag. The blog's newest lastmod is 2025-09-16; inspiration galleries date to 2024; several studio sitemaps date to early 2025. Content update cadence is a headwind for both classic rankings and AI-engine citations.

Full per-page detail (every URL with its findings and recommendation codes) is in section 11 and the downloadable CSV / XLSX files.

2 · Methodology & Data Caveats

3 · Inventory & Site Architecture

Two properties were audited in full. The main site is the consumer/brand site (Hebrew); the studio subdomain is the professional (A&D — architects & designers) platform with its own catalog, project gallery, kits and downloadable 3D assets. A third brand subdomain exists (mos.caesarstone.co.il — Master of Stone, for fabricators) and is outside this audit's sitemap scope.

www URLs
studio URLs
Real content pages
Internal edges crawled

Sitemap health

Every sitemap entry carries a lastmod. Freshness varies dramatically: page/catalog sitemaps were updated days before capture, while galleries date to 2024 and the blog's newest item is 2025-09-16. Two junk sitemaps (project-tags, project-date) contain a single URL.

4 · Technical SEO Findings

4.1 Indexability

  • Studio subdomain: sitewide noindex, nofollow — pages. Effect: zero Google visibility (confirmed via site: query returning no results at all).
  • www: utility pages noindexed — see list below.
  • P0 Remove the noindex from studio (or scope it to only the pages that must stay out). This is the single highest-impact change in this audit once the platform is meant to be public.

4.2 Canonicals

  • pages have no canonical tag at all (studio set + www utilities).
  • pages point their canonical to a genuinely different URL (list below); a further differ only by percent-encoding case (cosmetic, not harmful).

4.3 Titles

Duplicate-title groups above — incl. studio catalog pages showing another product's title (e.g. the 6041-Nordic-Loft page titled “6046 Moorland Fog”).

4.4 Meta descriptions

pages without a meta description; AI engines and SERPs will synthesize snippets from raw text instead.

4.5 Structure & templates

4.6 Sitemap junk & soft-404s

4.7 robots.txt & llms.txt

5 · Performance (Lighthouse, Mobile)

Lighthouse 12.8.2, mobile emulation with simulated throttling — the profile Google uses for mobile-first indexing. Result: brand templates are severely under-optimized. Production data (CrUX) would need Search Console access to cross-check, but these lab numbers already show unmissable regressions on the money templates.

Interpretation guide: Performance < 50 = failing (Core Web Vitals risk). LCP > 4 s is "poor"; the catalog/collections templates exceed 30 s under throttling. Studio's SEO score of 50–58 is driven primarily by the sitewide noindex (§4.1) and non-crawlable JS links. The empty 3D page hard-fails the run (“page did not paint any content”) — consistent with §4.6.

6 · Backlink Profile (Ahrefs)

Domain rating
Live backlinks
Live referring domains
All-time ref. domains

6.1 Top referring domains

6.2 Top linked pages

Spam & legacy findings
Legacy link equity (recoverable): the old site's /The-Catalog/Pages/*.aspx and /design-inspiration/... URLs still hold links from serious Israeli forums (tapuz, DR 70, dozens of threads). Most now 301 correctly, but these legacy patterns should be audited for 404s and kept mapped (kitchen-design-new.aspx = 404 with 37 refdomains; bathroom-design.aspx = 404 with 30 refdomains — see table below).

7 · Internal Linking

Internal edges
Orphan pages
Link targets outside sitemap
Of which file/asset links

The internal graph is well connected overall — only real pages receive no internal links. The larger hygiene issue: distinct internal link targets point to URLs that are not in the crawl set (no-sitemap utility URLs, assets, query URLs) — checked, most are harmless (cart/checkout/search paths that are deliberately non-indexable), but the list should be reviewed so no valuable page silently disappears from the click graph.

7.1 Orphan pages

7.2 Most internally linked pages

7.3 Non-sitemap link targets (top)

8 · Duplicate Pages & Cannibalization

Raw duplicate-title groups, canonical mismatches and their per-page details are in the appendix table.

9 · GEO / AI-Engine Readiness

10 · AI-Engine Visibility (ZeroRank)

What AI engines actually answer when users ask the tracked questions — and which pages they cite. Read-only pull from the connected ZeroRank workspace, captured 2026-10-01 (day-one baseline). Every figure is verifiable against the saved answer set.

Tracked prompts (4 HE · 4 EN)
8
Engine answers analyzed
32
Answers mentioning the brand
24 (75%)
Answers citing owned URLs
8
Unique owned URLs cited
12

10.1 Engine coverage

Across 8 tracked prompts (locale IL; 4 Hebrew / 4 English) the engines returned 32 answers — ChatGPT 16 · Google AI Overview 14 · Perplexity 2. 24 answers (75%) mention Caesarstone / אבן קיסר; Google AI Overview is the most consistent (12/14, 86%) ahead of ChatGPT (11/16, 69%) and Perplexity (1/2). 8 answers (25%) cite at least one Caesarstone-owned URL; 4 answers cite third-party pages about the brand. A concentrated example: a single ChatGPT answer on “מהו השיש הכי מומלץ למטבח בישראל” cites 4 caesarstone.co.il pages.

EngineAnswersMentions brandMention rateCites owned URLOwned-cite rate
ChatGPT161169%425%
Google AI Overview141286%429%
Perplexity2150%00%
All engines322475%825%

Tracked prompt set: 207013 “מהו השיש הכי מומלץ למטבח בישראל” · 207014 “איזה מותג שיש הכי טוב ואיכותי” · 207015 “אבן קיסר או גרניט — מה עדיף למטבח” · 207016 “שיש פורצלן מומלץ — איזה מותגים קיימים” · 207017 “best quartz countertop brand” · 207018 “caesarstone vs granite countertops which is better” · 207019 “top countertop brands for architects and designers” · 207020 “where to download CAD BIM files for countertops”.

10.2 Owned URLs the engines cite (per site)

Unique Caesarstone-owned URLs cited across all answers, grouped by property: caesarstone.co.il 7 · caesarstone.com 2 · studio.caesarstoneus.com 3. The noindexed IL studio (studio.caesarstone.co.il) is never cited — consistent with the §1 finding.

SiteCited URLEngine(s)Prompt(s)
caesarstone.co.il (IL)caesarstone.co.il/blog/marble-for-kitchensGoogle AI Overview207014
caesarstone.co.il (IL)caesarstone.co.il/caesarstone-porcelainGoogle AI Overview207016
caesarstone.co.il (IL)caesarstone.co.il/caesarstone-quartz/ChatGPT207013
caesarstone.co.il (IL)caesarstone.co.il/care-and-maintenance/porcelain/ChatGPT207013
caesarstone.co.il (IL)caesarstone.co.il/care-and-maintenance/quartz/ChatGPT207013
caesarstone.co.il (IL)caesarstone.co.il/collection-2026/ChatGPT207013
caesarstone.co.il (IL)caesarstone.co.il/project/שיש-למטבחיםGoogle AI Overview207014
caesarstone.com (global)caesarstone.com/ChatGPT207019
caesarstone.com (global)caesarstone.com/professional-partners-resources/ChatGPT207020
studio.caesarstoneus.com (US studio)studio.caesarstoneus.com/catalog/1141-pure-white/ChatGPT207020
studio.caesarstoneus.com (US studio)studio.caesarstoneus.com/catalog/5143-white-attica/ChatGPT207020
studio.caesarstoneus.com (US studio)studio.caesarstoneus.com/the-role-of-countertops-in-modern-interior-designGoogle AI Overview207019

10.3 Third-party pages the engines rely on

4 answers cite 9 independent pages (comparison articles, retailers, design blogs) when evaluating the brand. These are the off-site sources AI engines lean on — the outreach targets that influence what the engines say.

DomainURLEngine(s)Prompt(s)
blackburnsinteriors.comblackburnsinteriors.com/countertop-tips/cambria-vs-silestone-vs-caesarstone/ChatGPT207017
hub.stellantis.comhub.stellantis.com/article/silestone-vs-caesarstone-vs-cambria-the-quartz-countertop-showdownGoogle AI Overview207018
madeinstone.com.aumadeinstone.com.au/why-choose-caesarstone-quartzGoogle AI Overview207018
marble.commarble.com/articles/caesarstone-vs-graniteGoogle AI Overview207018
maxspacestoneworks.commaxspacestoneworks.com/caesarstone-countertops-pros-and-consGoogle AI Overview207018
nir-zvi.co.ilnir-zvi.co.il/why-choose-caesarstone-kitchenGoogle AI Overview207014
northernlightsdesign.comnorthernlightsdesign.com/comparisons/cambria-vs-silestone-vs-caesarstoneChatGPT207017
sile-stone.comsile-stone.com/caesarstoneGoogle AI Overview207018
traditionaldesignsltd.comtraditionaldesignsltd.com/quartz-countertops/caesarstone/5131-calacattaGoogle AI Overview207019
Method & scope. Source: connected ZeroRank workspace — brand Caesarstone IL, prompt set 207013–207020, locale IL; read-only pull 2026-10-01 (answers collected 10:45–10:49 UTC). “Owned” = caesarstone.co.il / caesarstone.com / studio.caesarstoneus.com URLs; “owned-cite” counts answers citing ≥1 such URL. URLs normalized (utm parameters stripped) and deduplicated per answer. Day-one baseline: rank / share-of-voice trends and sentiment require repeat runs; aiSearchVolume is an AI-prompt estimate (currently 0), not keyword search volume.

11 · Recommendations Summary

P0 — do first
P1 — high impact
P2 — optimization

12 · Per-Page Appendix (all URLs)

Every audited URL with its key facts and recommendation codes. Downloads: audit_per_page.csv · caesarstone_audit_pages.xlsx

Recommendation codes